Appreciate the perspective. I think the fear is that figures like Zia will sand off Reform's edgyness, especially towards immigration. Lowe was hardline towards it, which is his selling point. Zia has said a lot of correct things e.g. repealing The Online Safety Act, but will an Asian who's parents are from Sri Lanka adaquetly fix immigration?
He has professionalised the party? With the new justice spokesperson saying some trans men should be allowed in women's prisons only to be contradicted by Farage a short while later does not look very professional at all, anymore than David Bull, Zia's replacement as party chairman, praising immigration then disappearing.
"It is we, the Zianists, who recognise Zia’s contributions to Reform, and it is we who actually care about winning power. Winning power is the only thing that matters."
Well-meaning Labourites have now discovered just how that approach ends up...
Why is the contributor an enemy of pimlico journal ?
Appreciate the perspective. I think the fear is that figures like Zia will sand off Reform's edgyness, especially towards immigration. Lowe was hardline towards it, which is his selling point. Zia has said a lot of correct things e.g. repealing The Online Safety Act, but will an Asian who's parents are from Sri Lanka adaquetly fix immigration?
This is…good, but I really question whether “plump lips” was necessary
Edit: thanks for the gold
Well I've seen it all now. A fluff piece for Zia 😂😂
He has professionalised the party? With the new justice spokesperson saying some trans men should be allowed in women's prisons only to be contradicted by Farage a short while later does not look very professional at all, anymore than David Bull, Zia's replacement as party chairman, praising immigration then disappearing.
A man without a party for a party without a Man. Amen. I am a proud Zianist and will follow him to the ends of the earth and back.
Schroedinger's Sarcasm.
I'm so confused that this reads like satire and yet the punchline never quite arrives...
Why Pimlico Journal has published this dreadful piece is beyond me. Appallingly one-sided.
What a disgusting article. Full of sh**.
Why is it disgusting?
"It is we, the Zianists, who recognise Zia’s contributions to Reform, and it is we who actually care about winning power. Winning power is the only thing that matters."
Well-meaning Labourites have now discovered just how that approach ends up...
A strange decision to allow this to be published on the Pimlico Journal. What is it supposed to achieve?
Big no.
Parties are vehicles. Does it matter if you get one over on the Tories if the country continues on a (maybe slightly flattened) curve of decline?