«It also turns out that Brits in 2016 did not want to replace European workers with Commonwealth migrants»
Polls tell you what people's wishful thinking is, what their preferences are if they were to cost nothing, not what they would vote for.
Advocates of mass immigrations have been persuasively arguing that it works great for middle-class native voters by greatly boosting property gains and by significantly "moderating" the wage cost of services, so the question is whether middle-class voters are willing to see their property prices halve and pay double for deliveries, gardening, etc.
«The public had been asked about individual nationalities, and in many cases had expressed clear opposition. Yet some of the largest flows that followed came from precisely those countries.»
The Government is collaborating in an invasion. The so-called authorities are busily engaged in telling us they are trying to stop it - which they are not, this is a lie - and in gaslighting the indigenous population as to 'the Enrichment of Multiculturalism' - which is another, increasingly self-evident, lie. For the present, the useful idiots promoting immigration - the 'Refugees Welcome' caucus - have the floor. The situation is however unsustainable. Sooner or later, growing infrastructure stress and social instability will become breakdown, sporadic and partial at first. This will provoke backlash, and according to some, chronic, widespread social disturbance, tantamount to low-level "civil war". We can only pray that Yookay does not descend into the murderous chaos which characterises eg the Middle East. On the evidence however, this is the actual goal.
Lenin predicted that Capitalism would suck in labour from across the World and America would be the prime example.
Unfortunately he had a much better understanding of the long-term trajectory of Liberal Capitalism than most on the Right.
«It also turns out that Brits in 2016 did not want to replace European workers with Commonwealth migrants»
Polls tell you what people's wishful thinking is, what their preferences are if they were to cost nothing, not what they would vote for.
Advocates of mass immigrations have been persuasively arguing that it works great for middle-class native voters by greatly boosting property gains and by significantly "moderating" the wage cost of services, so the question is whether middle-class voters are willing to see their property prices halve and pay double for deliveries, gardening, etc.
«The public had been asked about individual nationalities, and in many cases had expressed clear opposition. Yet some of the largest flows that followed came from precisely those countries.»
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/buyout-boss-says-brexit-will-be-good-his-business-will-mean-30-cut-uk-wages-1602631 “One of the biggest names in European private equity said that Brexit will be good for his business, but will mean a 30% wage reduction for UK workers. [...] He added that EU immigration will be replaced with workers from the Indian subcontinent and Africa, willing to accept "substantially" lower pay.”
The Government is collaborating in an invasion. The so-called authorities are busily engaged in telling us they are trying to stop it - which they are not, this is a lie - and in gaslighting the indigenous population as to 'the Enrichment of Multiculturalism' - which is another, increasingly self-evident, lie. For the present, the useful idiots promoting immigration - the 'Refugees Welcome' caucus - have the floor. The situation is however unsustainable. Sooner or later, growing infrastructure stress and social instability will become breakdown, sporadic and partial at first. This will provoke backlash, and according to some, chronic, widespread social disturbance, tantamount to low-level "civil war". We can only pray that Yookay does not descend into the murderous chaos which characterises eg the Middle East. On the evidence however, this is the actual goal.