That this organisation considers conservative opinion on mass immigration and Islamic terrorism more dangerous to the Blob than Islamic extremism, confirms that it is a subversive cell, probably of Fabian and Common Purpose agents
The officers who are prepared to be instrumental in delivering this policy should be outed. They cannot possibly genuinely believe that they are a force for good. They are obviously astute enough to operate in accordance with instructions and exploit the grief and goodwill of victims’ families. I simply don’t buy into the idea that they are themselves being manipulated or indoctrinated or are “just following orders” (the Nuremberg defence). They will have been carefully selected for the role, not press-ganged, and expertly trained. It is a gargantuan public gaslighting operation. My MP is a member of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament and I will draw his attention to it. Next time, and sadly there will be one, these journalists should get a spoiler out at the earliest opportunity.
What is being described here in the behavior of these 'liason' units are technologies developed by intelligence agencies that were used by cults beginning in the 1960s: Dependency, isolation, 'love bombing'.
Dark, dystopian and thoroughly believable. Confirmed what many of us suspected. Thank you for the in-depth research. What a "cute" euphemism for it- the "nudge" unit.
It's important that we remember not to ever think of the police as being social workers, even when they behave like they are. They are law enforcement. Nothing else. Tell them your name and address and then say, "I'd like to have my lawyer present now." It's hard when they're being nice, but you really shouldn't talk to them without legal representation present.
I can't say any of this is surprising. Anyone who has had dealings with the police where you are of some interest (and it truly can be the most-distant, vaguest of interest) will know what it's like when they try to buddy up with you. In such traumatic situations it's not surprising they have the families hook, line and sinker to then censor their opinions. Never trust a copper, ever.
I doubt any Liberal/Conservative-party split in the Anglosphere actually means much of anything. While not British, I seem to recall its' now recognized the Tory administration of the '00's first tolerated the Channel-crossings?
Fascinating read which strikes a good balance between the ‘conspiracy’ (that they write the Victim Statements and manage every aspect of the PR), and the reality which, as it turns out is not too far removed from the conspiracy.
I wonder what the origin is of the ‘nudge’ moniker? I’ve always imagined some shadowy and smoke-filled deep state room where the phone rings. “There’s been another mass casualty event Boss, we have the victims’ families in isolation but they’re really angry and threatening to phone the press”
There was a book called Nudge in 2008 that popularized the theory.
The idea is that effective changing of idea requires a number of small changes over time, which works better than sudden large changes.
It fits in with ideological capture of institutions. If you can slowly "boil off" the ones that are most opposed to your ideas so they leave, you can eventually push the institution very far towards ideas that were initially unacceptable in the other direction. You don't even need to be at the top initially, as long as you stay there. The top will eventually come to you.
Fascinating and disturbing. Thank you
It's astounding how far the British will go to protect Islamists
The state crushes anything that goes against the replacement agenda.
That this organisation considers conservative opinion on mass immigration and Islamic terrorism more dangerous to the Blob than Islamic extremism, confirms that it is a subversive cell, probably of Fabian and Common Purpose agents
The officers who are prepared to be instrumental in delivering this policy should be outed. They cannot possibly genuinely believe that they are a force for good. They are obviously astute enough to operate in accordance with instructions and exploit the grief and goodwill of victims’ families. I simply don’t buy into the idea that they are themselves being manipulated or indoctrinated or are “just following orders” (the Nuremberg defence). They will have been carefully selected for the role, not press-ganged, and expertly trained. It is a gargantuan public gaslighting operation. My MP is a member of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament and I will draw his attention to it. Next time, and sadly there will be one, these journalists should get a spoiler out at the earliest opportunity.
What is being described here in the behavior of these 'liason' units are technologies developed by intelligence agencies that were used by cults beginning in the 1960s: Dependency, isolation, 'love bombing'.
Dark, dystopian and thoroughly believable. Confirmed what many of us suspected. Thank you for the in-depth research. What a "cute" euphemism for it- the "nudge" unit.
It's important that we remember not to ever think of the police as being social workers, even when they behave like they are. They are law enforcement. Nothing else. Tell them your name and address and then say, "I'd like to have my lawyer present now." It's hard when they're being nice, but you really shouldn't talk to them without legal representation present.
I can't say any of this is surprising. Anyone who has had dealings with the police where you are of some interest (and it truly can be the most-distant, vaguest of interest) will know what it's like when they try to buddy up with you. In such traumatic situations it's not surprising they have the families hook, line and sinker to then censor their opinions. Never trust a copper, ever.
I would direct everybody to the great British TV drama "1990" starring Edward Woodward.
That dystopia nightmare is a pretty good description of the Yookay in 2026.
I always thought this, thank you for confirming
Was the Conservative party in on this move to put Community Relations before justice and truth? It doesn't sound like this started in July 2024.
I doubt any Liberal/Conservative-party split in the Anglosphere actually means much of anything. While not British, I seem to recall its' now recognized the Tory administration of the '00's first tolerated the Channel-crossings?
We need to get this article out to the next victim's family before the RICU unit gets to them.
Disgusting.
Fascinating read which strikes a good balance between the ‘conspiracy’ (that they write the Victim Statements and manage every aspect of the PR), and the reality which, as it turns out is not too far removed from the conspiracy.
I wonder what the origin is of the ‘nudge’ moniker? I’ve always imagined some shadowy and smoke-filled deep state room where the phone rings. “There’s been another mass casualty event Boss, we have the victims’ families in isolation but they’re really angry and threatening to phone the press”
“Give them a nudge”
Click
There was a book called Nudge in 2008 that popularized the theory.
The idea is that effective changing of idea requires a number of small changes over time, which works better than sudden large changes.
It fits in with ideological capture of institutions. If you can slowly "boil off" the ones that are most opposed to your ideas so they leave, you can eventually push the institution very far towards ideas that were initially unacceptable in the other direction. You don't even need to be at the top initially, as long as you stay there. The top will eventually come to you.
This was called CRS / Community Relations Service in the states, supposedly Trump defunded it last year.
It got refunded this year for some reason
"The unelected judge said so! I had to do it!" cries President Low Trump impotently.
Stalin the Aromatherapist.
Trust the state agents to step over murder victims ,simply to hold their tawdry narrative and overseers policies together.
The more crime? The more work for such saprophytes.