Whatever happens to the future of this country, White people need to step over the old Left v Right paradigm and organise for their OWN COLLECTIVE interests.
Everything else is a sideshow or containment operation.
White people need political representation and advocacy, particularly as the demographics get worse and worse.
> So ‘anti-racism’ — in this sense — must inherently mean weighing the scales in favour of ethnic minorities and against the white British.
This is what anti-racism means in every situation it is deployed. The point is always to leverage the victim classes—to use them as a cudgel with which to beat the native middle class.
The project is always and everywhere one where the Starmers and Blairs allow their clients to punish their enemies, while claiming that any objection is evil (“Bigot!”) and verboten (Facebook post -> jail).
We’ve been doing this in America since the 1950’s (earlier, actually, if you look closely at the Great Migration).
And now we, America, would like bequeath this beautiful approach to managing the populace to all of Europe. Fortunately, the enlightened mandarins at the European Commission are eager to oblige.
The McPherson report is where it all began. The Henry Nowak case is a prime example of what happens to a society that has been artificially engineered. It is not unintended consequences, it is the malevolent end goals of the designers.
The net result of the McPherson report and the later Lammy review, both contributed to not only changing policing to a woke arm of the state but also transforming the entire labour movement into a race grievance industry, under the auspices of the conceptual fraud of institutional racism.
What followed was the abolishing of double jeopardy, where now the state can continue to prosecute citizens until they win. Furthermore, hate speech and racially aggravated offences went supersonic, bolstered by the resulting archipelago of ambiguous speech crime legislation.
Police now spend half their working time pursuing hate incidents in place of catching criminals. Stop and search was collapsed in high crime areas, and violent knife-related murder increased dramatically, particularly black-on-black, with London being the exemplar. This is the result of instead holding tackling crime as a priority and shifting to prioritising disproportionality by race.
The social environment created by the inquisitors of antiracism means police now second-guess every interaction in fear of being the focus of a witch hunt; recent high-profile police armed response incidents attest to this dynamic, and many officers are now leaving these specialised response units.
An additional affront stemming from the pervasive influence of anti-racism in society is the scant attention given to white murder victims by legacy media, as their stories deviate from the scripted narratives of psychosocial programming. Notable examples include Kriss Donald, a fifteen-year-old from Glasgow murdered by a group of men of Pakistani heritage, and Charlene Downs, a fourteen-year-old allegedly killed by Iyad Albattikhi and Mohammed Reveshi. The trial collapsed, and both men were released. Note, there was never any outrage that both of these crimes were race-related. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) later criticised the police, finding “strategic and tactical failures” in evidence management, leading to disciplinary action against officers, including one forced resignation (later overturned). Food for thought, no pun intended, considering some of the more gruesome details that relate to the Charlene Downes case. Unless the anti-racism white racism programming of police officers is skewered root and branch from the police force, we will see many more incidents like this in the coming months and years.
The MacPherson Report (1999) branded every institution, including political parties, police, schools, and unions, as institutionally racist. In the immediate aftermath, and inevitable hysteria was the birthing of the race inquisitors in the guise of race equality officers, armoured with compulsory unconscious bias courses and anti-racism white racism programming modules.
The McPherson report (MPR), which in and of itself was a clown show. The MPR and the term institutional racism are synonymous and equally odious and incredible, considering the many confounding and broad range of phenomena that bear influence on social pathologies, in this case, focused on racism.
The MPR panel neglected to appoint a criminologist and was made up of a token police officer and a plethora of race lobbying activists; unsurprisingly, in this atmosphere, they fell over institutional racism in their haste to discover it. The report admitted they found no evidence of obvious discrimination by police officers in their investigation of the Stephen Lawrence murder, so they sneaked in the terms “unwitting racism” and “perception of racism” as proof, hence where unconscious bias antiracism training emerged as a corporate product.
The term “ institutional racism” in terms of British institutions was a fraudulent conception that paradoxically has led to institutions that are institutionally racist against the white natives of Britain.
For anyone interested, I wrote an article last year which focuses on how the McPherson report impacted the behaviour of trade unions and other institutions of the UK in some detail. It’s no accident this Report was made in 1999, just two years after Blair was elected. Fabian fingerprints are all over the inquiry and the inevitable damage its fraudulent findings exerted on British society. The article is titled Psychosocial forces, pathologising British society
The police in this country are another institution that I can't see being worth reforming. The whole set-up should just be replaced with a new National Police/Gendarmerie system like they have in France. You can set the intentions and incentives clearly from day one. Everyone who wants to come across from the old forces will be subject to the new checks and expectations.
For one thing a comprehensive review of their prior service and an explicit new set of rules and expectations which they have to adhere to in-line with the new centralised police force.
Essentially you just want to filter out the career yes-men and those just wanting an easy ride rather than police with the intent of fairness for all even if that means outweighed outcomes towards certain ethnic and racial groups.
You'd be looking for evidence of them treating white people unfavourably? Also- isn't the idea of a Gendarmerie in the UK rather un- British? They are after all part of the military- and its historically been regarded as a bad thing here for the military to interact directly with the public.
"Historically" Britain wasn't what it was today. You can't police by consent anymore and any attempts to create a system where that is true again is naive. Centralising the police forces is the great leveller as you can more easily direct what policing is and isn't in this country.
Currently even if the government were to demand an end to favourable policing to BAME many regional forces could quite easily resist it. Not hard to imagine a future under Reform where heavily compromised services like GMP or the Met drag their heels whilst North Yorkshire and Lincolnshire go along with it.
Scrap the lot. Start again (plus a British Gendarmerie would be helpful for any significant deportation policy).
1979 Iran rings a bell. .........I will not answer any questions asked by the Police if I am alone or without my phone video. I do not trust them at all nowadays.
Great now we get to pay for this entire family to live in HMP Club Med for the next few years. At which point they'll be releeased and granted UC and a council flat in Zone 1 London.
By and large, I have to agree with this analysis. However, homunculus Farage's appeal to 'cold rage' is disturbing. An incitement to violence? Sounds like that...😈
This once Great Nation of World Leaders is changing, now we have a bunch of Journeymen-,persons. At every level, Journalists,NHS, Legal Eagles, Education, Parliment, Armed Services, Social Services,Councillors, everyone in Authority.
Failing a Nation because of one word, RACISM.
3rd June 2026, Parliment blamed one man, for the Great 🇬🇧 British Peoples unrest.
Well said. It is inexplicably tragic that it took Henry’s murder to shine a spotlight on the issue of virulent, deadly discrimination against White people.
I wonder if this will have any effect upon the police minimizing, discounting, or denying the claims of rape by little White girls. How many of these innocents have been raped and murdered in cold blood? How many thousands continue to be intimidated and threatened with death for non-compliance on a daily basis, only to be faced with the (literal) yawning indifference of the police?
The last statement was accurate, but should be expanded: “We must (be outraged) until the poison of anti-racist, anti-White culture is expunged from our CULTURE.”
We are living under a anti White Anarcho-tyranny.
Whatever happens to the future of this country, White people need to step over the old Left v Right paradigm and organise for their OWN COLLECTIVE interests.
Everything else is a sideshow or containment operation.
White people need political representation and advocacy, particularly as the demographics get worse and worse.
Every day, it gets closer: the day when our patience runs out.
Does it? He will be forgotten within a couple weeks, and Digwa will be added to the list with Rudakabana, the Manchester Bomber, and thousands more.
Sadly I think you’re right. In these days of need for instant gratification of one sort or another will be overtaking the headlines.
“Lived experience”, the most toxic and stupid ingredient of the Woke shithole theory.
> So ‘anti-racism’ — in this sense — must inherently mean weighing the scales in favour of ethnic minorities and against the white British.
This is what anti-racism means in every situation it is deployed. The point is always to leverage the victim classes—to use them as a cudgel with which to beat the native middle class.
The project is always and everywhere one where the Starmers and Blairs allow their clients to punish their enemies, while claiming that any objection is evil (“Bigot!”) and verboten (Facebook post -> jail).
We’ve been doing this in America since the 1950’s (earlier, actually, if you look closely at the Great Migration).
And now we, America, would like bequeath this beautiful approach to managing the populace to all of Europe. Fortunately, the enlightened mandarins at the European Commission are eager to oblige.
What did y'all think anti-racism meant? Fair treatment? Equality?
The McPherson report is where it all began. The Henry Nowak case is a prime example of what happens to a society that has been artificially engineered. It is not unintended consequences, it is the malevolent end goals of the designers.
The net result of the McPherson report and the later Lammy review, both contributed to not only changing policing to a woke arm of the state but also transforming the entire labour movement into a race grievance industry, under the auspices of the conceptual fraud of institutional racism.
What followed was the abolishing of double jeopardy, where now the state can continue to prosecute citizens until they win. Furthermore, hate speech and racially aggravated offences went supersonic, bolstered by the resulting archipelago of ambiguous speech crime legislation.
Police now spend half their working time pursuing hate incidents in place of catching criminals. Stop and search was collapsed in high crime areas, and violent knife-related murder increased dramatically, particularly black-on-black, with London being the exemplar. This is the result of instead holding tackling crime as a priority and shifting to prioritising disproportionality by race.
The social environment created by the inquisitors of antiracism means police now second-guess every interaction in fear of being the focus of a witch hunt; recent high-profile police armed response incidents attest to this dynamic, and many officers are now leaving these specialised response units.
An additional affront stemming from the pervasive influence of anti-racism in society is the scant attention given to white murder victims by legacy media, as their stories deviate from the scripted narratives of psychosocial programming. Notable examples include Kriss Donald, a fifteen-year-old from Glasgow murdered by a group of men of Pakistani heritage, and Charlene Downs, a fourteen-year-old allegedly killed by Iyad Albattikhi and Mohammed Reveshi. The trial collapsed, and both men were released. Note, there was never any outrage that both of these crimes were race-related. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) later criticised the police, finding “strategic and tactical failures” in evidence management, leading to disciplinary action against officers, including one forced resignation (later overturned). Food for thought, no pun intended, considering some of the more gruesome details that relate to the Charlene Downes case. Unless the anti-racism white racism programming of police officers is skewered root and branch from the police force, we will see many more incidents like this in the coming months and years.
The MacPherson Report (1999) branded every institution, including political parties, police, schools, and unions, as institutionally racist. In the immediate aftermath, and inevitable hysteria was the birthing of the race inquisitors in the guise of race equality officers, armoured with compulsory unconscious bias courses and anti-racism white racism programming modules.
The McPherson report (MPR), which in and of itself was a clown show. The MPR and the term institutional racism are synonymous and equally odious and incredible, considering the many confounding and broad range of phenomena that bear influence on social pathologies, in this case, focused on racism.
The MPR panel neglected to appoint a criminologist and was made up of a token police officer and a plethora of race lobbying activists; unsurprisingly, in this atmosphere, they fell over institutional racism in their haste to discover it. The report admitted they found no evidence of obvious discrimination by police officers in their investigation of the Stephen Lawrence murder, so they sneaked in the terms “unwitting racism” and “perception of racism” as proof, hence where unconscious bias antiracism training emerged as a corporate product.
The term “ institutional racism” in terms of British institutions was a fraudulent conception that paradoxically has led to institutions that are institutionally racist against the white natives of Britain.
For anyone interested, I wrote an article last year which focuses on how the McPherson report impacted the behaviour of trade unions and other institutions of the UK in some detail. It’s no accident this Report was made in 1999, just two years after Blair was elected. Fabian fingerprints are all over the inquiry and the inevitable damage its fraudulent findings exerted on British society. The article is titled Psychosocial forces, pathologising British society
The police in this country are another institution that I can't see being worth reforming. The whole set-up should just be replaced with a new National Police/Gendarmerie system like they have in France. You can set the intentions and incentives clearly from day one. Everyone who wants to come across from the old forces will be subject to the new checks and expectations.
What checks would you recommend?
For one thing a comprehensive review of their prior service and an explicit new set of rules and expectations which they have to adhere to in-line with the new centralised police force.
Essentially you just want to filter out the career yes-men and those just wanting an easy ride rather than police with the intent of fairness for all even if that means outweighed outcomes towards certain ethnic and racial groups.
You'd be looking for evidence of them treating white people unfavourably? Also- isn't the idea of a Gendarmerie in the UK rather un- British? They are after all part of the military- and its historically been regarded as a bad thing here for the military to interact directly with the public.
"Historically" Britain wasn't what it was today. You can't police by consent anymore and any attempts to create a system where that is true again is naive. Centralising the police forces is the great leveller as you can more easily direct what policing is and isn't in this country.
Currently even if the government were to demand an end to favourable policing to BAME many regional forces could quite easily resist it. Not hard to imagine a future under Reform where heavily compromised services like GMP or the Met drag their heels whilst North Yorkshire and Lincolnshire go along with it.
Scrap the lot. Start again (plus a British Gendarmerie would be helpful for any significant deportation policy).
1979 Iran rings a bell. .........I will not answer any questions asked by the Police if I am alone or without my phone video. I do not trust them at all nowadays.
Great now we get to pay for this entire family to live in HMP Club Med for the next few years. At which point they'll be releeased and granted UC and a council flat in Zone 1 London.
By and large, I have to agree with this analysis. However, homunculus Farage's appeal to 'cold rage' is disturbing. An incitement to violence? Sounds like that...😈
I am really angry Frank. Boiling rage for the poor boy. He is only saying what we all feel.
Hot rage, perhaps “hot headed” rage might be an incitement to violence. Cold rage is a determination to see the system changed. Quite right I’d say.
You haven’t a clue who is stockpiling those events & the lack of justice….
This once Great Nation of World Leaders is changing, now we have a bunch of Journeymen-,persons. At every level, Journalists,NHS, Legal Eagles, Education, Parliment, Armed Services, Social Services,Councillors, everyone in Authority.
Failing a Nation because of one word, RACISM.
3rd June 2026, Parliment blamed one man, for the Great 🇬🇧 British Peoples unrest.
Well said. It is inexplicably tragic that it took Henry’s murder to shine a spotlight on the issue of virulent, deadly discrimination against White people.
I wonder if this will have any effect upon the police minimizing, discounting, or denying the claims of rape by little White girls. How many of these innocents have been raped and murdered in cold blood? How many thousands continue to be intimidated and threatened with death for non-compliance on a daily basis, only to be faced with the (literal) yawning indifference of the police?
The last statement was accurate, but should be expanded: “We must (be outraged) until the poison of anti-racist, anti-White culture is expunged from our CULTURE.”
ENOUGH!
There was one time that if you used the word Race, automatically it became a race incident. Now it's just the norm.
Indoctrinated policing:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-38319283
Is it appropriate to start demand that sihks bow down to us to show solidarity with Henry Nova? Didn't think so…
This is deeply concerning. A serious discussion needs to take place about solutions to issues raised.