I suppose someone will always take the contrarian view, but this post is completely misguided, notwithstanding the formal language. If Trump wanted to reorient US foreign policy, he could have done it without going to the bother of a war that, based on his own stated objectives in February, was a signal failure. Sometimes the overwhelming majority is actually correct. This is one such example.
This is the worst thing I've read on Pimlico Journal, anywhere actually.
I wonder if the millions of Iranian citizens who had their hopes built up, only to now be told by Trump "nah, I never sought regime change" are forgiving at all.
And the parents of those poor schoolgirls.
With this war, Trump has scored his very own Suez moment, and irreparably damaged the cause of populist right parties around the West.
When Reform fail in 2029, this war may be the biggest reason why they will.
Notwithstanding the interesting comparison of American and Polish-Lithuanian politics at the beginning, an unedited LLM response to the rhetorical question posed in the headline would have been more incisive and reflective of reality. The author ought to have put his thesaurus down and picked up a newspaper before writing an article on current events.
The premise of this article brings to mind the meme of the tower block being held up by flimsy wooden splints, each captioned 'if...'
The Trump admin already proved it could let Israel and Iran scrap from afar (neither has the capability to harm the other to extent to extract significant concessions) and then oversee peace negotiations in 2025.
There was no grand plan or 4D chess, just President and his inner circle high on victory in Venezuela who thought they could win another war by standoff strikes.
If the peace does hold, the long term consequences will be interesting as the author points out, it would have been good to see this strand expanded at the expense of the spin.
Another NeoCon disaster. It started with a double tap on a girls school and went down hill from there.
All we gain from these NeoCon wars is high inflation and waves and waves of "refugees".
A lot of the people on the dinghies from France are from Iran. Except the numbers to rise.
**Expect
I suppose someone will always take the contrarian view, but this post is completely misguided, notwithstanding the formal language. If Trump wanted to reorient US foreign policy, he could have done it without going to the bother of a war that, based on his own stated objectives in February, was a signal failure. Sometimes the overwhelming majority is actually correct. This is one such example.
This is the worst thing I've read on Pimlico Journal, anywhere actually.
I wonder if the millions of Iranian citizens who had their hopes built up, only to now be told by Trump "nah, I never sought regime change" are forgiving at all.
And the parents of those poor schoolgirls.
With this war, Trump has scored his very own Suez moment, and irreparably damaged the cause of populist right parties around the West.
When Reform fail in 2029, this war may be the biggest reason why they will.
The author's points about the internal structure of the American Govt and the analogy to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth are quite interesting.
Excellent!
More Franz please :)
Notwithstanding the interesting comparison of American and Polish-Lithuanian politics at the beginning, an unedited LLM response to the rhetorical question posed in the headline would have been more incisive and reflective of reality. The author ought to have put his thesaurus down and picked up a newspaper before writing an article on current events.
The premise of this article brings to mind the meme of the tower block being held up by flimsy wooden splints, each captioned 'if...'
The Trump admin already proved it could let Israel and Iran scrap from afar (neither has the capability to harm the other to extent to extract significant concessions) and then oversee peace negotiations in 2025.
There was no grand plan or 4D chess, just President and his inner circle high on victory in Venezuela who thought they could win another war by standoff strikes.
If the peace does hold, the long term consequences will be interesting as the author points out, it would have been good to see this strand expanded at the expense of the spin.
The Covid addled brain of Putin initiated the whole thing with his disastrous invasion of the Ukraine