Whilst all the diagnoses are sensible, and it would be nice to have Italian waiters etc without Third World interlopers, I didn't see any solutions in the article as to how a government would achieve this in the absence of a military dictatorship.
How would we go about stopping the Surinamese and Mozambiquers without employing some sort of ethnicity test, which would have even the Daily Mail and Telegraph crying Foul Nazi.
Unless and until the EU sort their shit out, we should be closed to them as we are closed to the rest of the world.
If of course the EU got a grip of their own migration, then free(r) movement could be considered, but until then it is nonsensical sadly.
An immigration policy for Britain should be centered on our place as the homeland of a particular people namely, our diaspora which, according to some estimates, numbers up to 200 million.
So, immigration which might lead to permanent settlement should be limited to those who can show, or who can reasonably be presumed, to derive their ancestry substantially from British subjects born in the British Isles at any time before WW2.
Such people would, of course, be overwhelmingly Americans, Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, South Africans and they would overwhelmingly be white. That would lead to shreiks of "racism" but the only reaction to such accusations should be a shrug of the shoulders and a reaffirmation of "right of return" for all those of our stock
A thoughtful and highly informative article. I have learnt things I didn't know, thank you. On the 'Roma', my imagination is dominated by George Borrow's great but dated books, Lavengro and Romany Rye. The reality is something different, alas.
“Britain was right to extend residency to EU migrants who had arrived prior to 2016…”
Not prior to 2016, prior to 2021!
“Britain’s Windrushers came accidentally after a policy designed to enable greater migration between dominions begat an influx of Afro-Caribbean immigrants.”
Will this myth never die? The 1948 British Nationality Act had nothing to do with immigration! It was not intended to enable greater immigration from the Dominions and it did not have that effect.
Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders and South Africans all had the right to settle in Britain before that Act came into force in 1949. The 1949 Act did not give them any immigration rights that they had not previously had.
HMT Empire Windrush itself arrived in 1948, before the Act came into force. The Jamaicans on board had the right to settle in Britain because they were British subjects.
Whilst all the diagnoses are sensible, and it would be nice to have Italian waiters etc without Third World interlopers, I didn't see any solutions in the article as to how a government would achieve this in the absence of a military dictatorship.
How would we go about stopping the Surinamese and Mozambiquers without employing some sort of ethnicity test, which would have even the Daily Mail and Telegraph crying Foul Nazi.
Unless and until the EU sort their shit out, we should be closed to them as we are closed to the rest of the world.
If of course the EU got a grip of their own migration, then free(r) movement could be considered, but until then it is nonsensical sadly.
An immigration policy for Britain should be centered on our place as the homeland of a particular people namely, our diaspora which, according to some estimates, numbers up to 200 million.
So, immigration which might lead to permanent settlement should be limited to those who can show, or who can reasonably be presumed, to derive their ancestry substantially from British subjects born in the British Isles at any time before WW2.
Such people would, of course, be overwhelmingly Americans, Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, South Africans and they would overwhelmingly be white. That would lead to shreiks of "racism" but the only reaction to such accusations should be a shrug of the shoulders and a reaffirmation of "right of return" for all those of our stock
A most fascinating and disturbing analysis. A compelling argument to vote for Restore IMHO (and I am in a bi-racial union).
A thoughtful and highly informative article. I have learnt things I didn't know, thank you. On the 'Roma', my imagination is dominated by George Borrow's great but dated books, Lavengro and Romany Rye. The reality is something different, alas.
Interesting article. However:
“Britain was right to extend residency to EU migrants who had arrived prior to 2016…”
Not prior to 2016, prior to 2021!
“Britain’s Windrushers came accidentally after a policy designed to enable greater migration between dominions begat an influx of Afro-Caribbean immigrants.”
Will this myth never die? The 1948 British Nationality Act had nothing to do with immigration! It was not intended to enable greater immigration from the Dominions and it did not have that effect.
Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders and South Africans all had the right to settle in Britain before that Act came into force in 1949. The 1949 Act did not give them any immigration rights that they had not previously had.
HMT Empire Windrush itself arrived in 1948, before the Act came into force. The Jamaicans on board had the right to settle in Britain because they were British subjects.